I’m currently working on a 10-minute play. I’ve been inspired by directing a short(ish) play for RROAPS, starting to sharply focus on my dissertation (involving playwriting process), and also reading Perfect 10: Writing and Producing the 10-Minute Play by Gary Garrison (who was the excellent respondent for RROAPS a few years ago).

They play itself is also inspired by author Joseph Roach’s research in The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting (Theater: Theory/Text/Performance) that I’ve been gladly reading as part of one of my doctoral courses in theatre history. It traces the history of scientific knowledge’s effect on acting style through the ages and carefully dissects the language of the past to ensure we understand it within its historical context rather than from our own (often mistaken) contemporary meanings.

Yet another inspiration has been the recent visit of this year’s RROAPS respondent, Gordon Pengilly, who I’m also reading at the moment (Metastasis and Other Plays: Seeing in the Dark Drumheller or Dangerous Times). Mr. Pengilly’s comments about the individual shows as well as the entire evening were not only insightful but concise, educated, and honest… a combination of qualities we don’t always experience. Thanks to Mr. Pengilly for visiting.

A part of the reason for my reflection at this moment is the completion of the first draft of this new script late last night. Re-reading the script this morning truly helped me identify grammatical problems (as well as some smaller structural difficulties) but I’m quite excited about the script even in its current form. While not always possible, I am keenly aware of the major influences for both the germinal idea of the script itself as well as the catalyst for the inspiration to begin writing. I was actually planning on saving the writing of the script until my five-week-writing-sprint this summer (more on that later) but I found I could not contain the story any longer. The references above are largely responsible for my inability to wait.

Recently I’ve been researching copyright (somewhat an outgrowth of my FLOSS hobby) and I’ve started to wonder about the current state of copyright law, particularly in the United States. My hobby led me to the wonderful film Sita Sings the Blues by filmmaker Nina Paley. This, in turn, led me to the Question Copyright website and eventually to their “Minute Meme” project. I leave you, today, with the second “Minute Meme” entitled “All Creative Work is Derivative.” I strongly encourage you to visit their site and watch the video. It poses an interesting question about (and also a brief history of) the role of art in society and how that art progresses over time. These questions are nothing short of revolutionary for creative artists as we try to make our way through the trenches of the current copyright entanglement for content creators as we also celebrate the protections (though few) copyright law has provided artists. The question for me is simple: do I start using a Creative Commons license for my own work? I’m heavily leaning towards employing a license that respects other artists’ and creators’ rights while simultaneously acknowledging the existence of the internet. Creative work is exploding on the internet. Rather than trying to eliminate, box in, and/or legally threaten the individuals who put time into creating derivative works I want to support and celebrate those initiatives.